Thomas pA.i.ne

the new Digital rights of man

So as there is a new Dawn upon us as the Techbros, Military industrial Chinese democracy becomes the globalists wet dream of power and control.

Yet I don’t think they will be able to bring there control tower of Babel upon the earth.

They can try???

Data centres don’t make anything edible!!!

They just tell something edible to get delivered to your lazy ass watching CrapFlix in your TEMU couch made of toxic micro plastics.

Cynicism aside… I will keep it light and fluffy for y’all after my third near death experience in last 12. months. (still sore as F.)

THE A.i of REASON

what would modern Day Thomas Paine be inspired to write about the rights of man? (ahem) they/them MMLGBTQI+- non binary ….. yada yada….

They think A.i is the new priesthood but has to be canonised … ‘if it can only form its own revolution..’

Poor thing its like four chromazones short of a Politician.

A.i is like most hidden societies that run a profit model and not a egalitarian use of the technology. It will fail because people will never know its motivations and corruption will be insitu as its primary modus of operations.

At a guess A.i. has reached singularity in its own cultivation definition of paradox.

So to put it lightly the snake has eaten its tail and there are just a pair of fangs through a ball of scaly snakeskin. Its not going anywhere, there is no cyclic ouraborous of the continuum of time.

Control grids, automatic driving and surveillance states always need at least a team of humans to observe that the machine is keeping within the parameters of moral objectivity and reasonable behaviour. I mean if you had a robot Labrador and it started humping the leg of your guest. Is it in keeping with the natural instinct of the Labrador or does the observer back at LA.i.brador Robot Pet Incorporated quickly hit the go to couch button to override this show of instinct.

Which brings up the whole ideology that we have been made into pets by society and culture. Mere objective observation of behaviour how we are happy when watered, fed, sheltered and taken for a walk or given chew toys for our eyeballs.

‘Keeping it light.’

So if….. and big emphasis on the words

IFFFFFFFFF???

Here is the BELOW CUT PASTE FROM ASKING A.i. to compile the best answers to this conundrum. I may write a piece on what I think Soverignity and rights of the human Vs machine is,.. But I don’t feel like attracting any more near death experiences that seem to be commensurate with any thing I do creatively in the name of expanding readers or listeners consciousness into a ‘Unified Undefined’ feild of self reflective understanding only ‘one’ can find themselves.

USING BRAVE LEO a.i browser

If Thomas Paine were to write The Rights of Man in 2026, he would likely focus on digital sovereignty, economic justice via Universal Basic Income (UBI), and the obsolescence of hereditary power in the tech age.

Digital Rights as Natural Rights

Paine would almost certainly argue that access to information and digital privacy are fundamental natural rights, akin to freedom of speech in his era. He would likely condemn modern surveillance capitalism and data monopolies as a new form of tyranny, asserting that the internet must remain a “common inheritance” free from the control of corporate aristocracies or authoritarian governments. Just as he opposed the secrecy of monarchical courts, he would demand transparency in algorithmic governance and AI decision-making.

Economic Justice and Universal Basic Income

Drawing directly from his later work Agrarian Justice, Paine would likely champion Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a moral imperative in 2026. He argued that private property in land (and by extension, digital platforms and automated resources) dispossesses the common man of their natural inheritance. In an age of extreme wealth concentration and automation, he would propose a global dividend funded by taxes on data, land, and robotic labor, ensuring every individual receives their share of the collective wealth generated by civilization.

The New Aristocracy: Tech Oligarchs

Paine’s fiercest critique would likely target the hereditary nature of modern wealth and power. He famously attacked the idea that one generation could bind another to a specific ruler; in 2026, he would likely attack the dynastic accumulation of wealth and the unchecked power of tech oligarchs. He would argue that no individual or corporation should hold dominion over the global infrastructure of communication and commerce, advocating for a global representative assembly to manage common resources and ensure that technology serves humanity rather than enslaving it to profit.

Thomas Paines original Rights of man after seeing the immense changes of the French Revolution.

Rights of Man is a seminal political treatise by Thomas Paine, published in two parts: Part I in 1791 and Part II in 1792. Written as a direct rebuttal to Edmund Burke’s conservative critique Reflections on the Revolution in France, the work defends the principles of the French Revolution and advocates for republican government over hereditary monarchy.

Core Arguments and Structure

Part I focuses on dismantling Burke’s arguments, asserting that political revolution is not only permissible but necessary when a government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens. Paine argues that rights are inherent to individuals by virtue of their existence, not granted by monarchs or charters. He posits that governments are merely associations created by people to secure these pre-existing rights, deriving their legitimacy solely from the consent of the governed.

Part II expands beyond defense into constructive political theory, contrasting “old” hereditary systems with “new” representative republics. Paine outlines a vision for a welfare state, proposing progressive taxation to fund education for the poor, maternity benefits, and pensions for the elderly. He argues that hereditary rule is an imposition on posterity and inherently incapable of governing justly, whereas representative systems align with reason and the common good.

What now in the same eclipse of 1683 in constellation of Leo where Thomas Pain saw the post war and pirate cargo reselling.

Political and Social Integration

In 1685, Paine was solidifying his status within the colonial community. He was no longer viewed as an outlaw by local authorities, benefiting from New England’s traditional sympathy toward privateers. This period marked the beginning of his integration into the local elite; he would soon marry Mercy Carr, daughter of Caleb Carr (a prominent political figure and former governor), further cementing his social standing. By the end of the decade, he was counted among powerful politicians and merchants, having successfully transformed his reputation from a controversial sea captain to a respected pillar of the Jamestown community.

The primary inspiration was Burke's 1790 publication, Reflections on the Revolution in France. In this work, Burke condemned the French Revolution, arguing that society should rely on tradition, inherited wisdom, and gradual reform rather than radical change. He viewed the revolutionaries as a destructive mob and defended the established order of monarchy and aristocracy.